Opinions

 

All court opinions may be accessed at no charge via PACER through the "Written Opinions" link on the Reports page. You must, however, have an account to access the report via CM/ECF or PACER.

Access to opinions from 1997 to present, that are PDF searchable, unrestricted & unsealed, are also available through the Government Printing Office using the Advanced Search for Government Publications. There is no login required and publications are available free of charge.


Court's Web Site Opinions Database

The court's web site provides free access of some opinions, at the discretion of the judges, for the years 1998 to present. The results shown below are automatically displayed for all years, all judges, and all keywords/topics.

A search may be performed using the Search box above, or filtering by year, judge, and/or keyword/topic. To search for more than one judge and/or keywords/topics simultaneously, hold down the Ctrl key (or Command key) and select each item.

Keywords/Topic Date Title Description Judge
Dismissal or Conversion     09/23/2013     Pettingill Enterprises, Inc.,     

The Court found that, based on a variety of factors, conversion of the jointly administered case from Chapter 11 to Chapter 7 was in the best interest of creditors and the estate.  Adv. No. 12-10515 (Bkrtcy.D.N.M., September 23, 2013).

Chief Judge Robert H. Jacobvitz
Chapter 13, Res Judicata     09/20/2013     Cory Don Campbell and Leah Jill Campbell     

Court grants Chapter 13 debtors' motion to modify plan to eliminate a balloon payment requirement, because (i) debtors were never told about the balloon payment and (ii)  the payment requirement was the result of counsel's errors in calculating the means test; done properly the means test would have allowed debtors to file chapter 7, and make no payments to creditors.

Judge David T. Thuma
Automatic Stay, Discharge, Limitation of Actions, Nondischargeability     09/16/2013     Boydstun v. Galey     

Court declined to revoke debtor's discharge or declare creditor's debt nondischargeable, based on untimeliness of the complaint, creditor's knowledge of the facts prior to entry of discharge, and failure of proof on the merits.  Court found that creditor violated the automatic stay, but awarded no damages because of a failure of proof of damages.

Judge David T. Thuma
Automatic Stay, Discharge, Limitation of Actions, Nondischargeability     09/13/2013     Galey v. Boydstun     

Court declined to revoke debtor's discharge or declare creditor's debt nondischargeable, based on untimeliness of the complaint, creditor's knowledge of the facts prior to entry of discharge, and failure of proof on the merits.  Court found that creditor violated the automatic stay, but awarded no damages because of a failure of proof of damages.
 

Judge David T. Thuma
Summary Judgment     09/11/2013     Midas Auto Sales, Inc. v. Holley     

Order Denying Defendant's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment

Judge David T. Thuma
Adversary Proceedings - Procedural Matters, Damages, Discharge Injunction     09/10/2013     Otero v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC.     

Creditor's huge volume of telephone calls to debtor who owned mobile home pledged to creditor violated the discharge injunction, where debtor had no personal liability and the telephone calls could not fairly be characterized as attempts to determine debtor's intent to retain or surrender the mobile home.

Judge David T. Thuma
Reconsideration     09/04/2013     Javier Humberto Ontiveros     

Motion to set aside final order approving settlement agreement, pursuant to Rule 60(b)(3) and 60(b)(6), is denied.

Judge David T. Thuma
Chapter 11     08/27/2013     Kaye Elizabeth Sandford     

 Individual debtor's motion to modify confirmed chapter 11 plan is denied, under a discretionary standard

Judge David T. Thuma
Avoidance Actions, Fraudulent Transfers, Limitation of Actions, Ponzi Scheme Issues, Time     08/20/2013     Wagner v. Ultima Homes, Inc., et al     

In a case involving a Ponzi scheme, the Court found that: (1) a bankruptcy trustee pursuing a state law fraudulent transfer claim under 11 U.S.C. § 544 may not use the ten-year look back period available to the IRS when it seeks to collect taxes; (2) the four-year look back period was not tolled by the adverse domination theory, the discovery rule, or the doctrine of relation back.  Adv. No. 12-1110 (Bkrtcy.D.N.M. August 20, 2013).

Chief Judge Robert H. Jacobvitz
Dischargeability, Setoff     08/12/2013     Danbom v. Prewitt     

Creditors' claim held nondischargeable under 523(a)(4) where mechanic signed joint check and then never performed the agreed-upon work.

Judge David T. Thuma

Pages